Follow the science?

 Nobody has followed the scientific method in covid 19 pandemic. The null hypothesis that there is no new virus causing a new disease has not been falsified. 

Deaths follow the profile of old age Flu death almost perfectly. It would have to be proven that the profile was statistically significantly from previous years. This has not been done 

How do we know that covid 19 has not been around for years? We did not test for it so how could we know. If the test had not been designed now, we would think this was a bad flu. 

If somebody tests false positive for Covid 19 and has flu symptoms this person will be let into the covid ward  and can be infected with whatever pneumonia the others there have. Pretty soon the person may be intubated and  die. Is this a Covid death?


A false positive rate of 7% would explain all the  Covid cases in the US. Once tested any person dying would be a covid death + suspected deaths encouraged by money for every Covid death.


All excess deaths attributed to covid could be temperature related (normally 50 000 excess winter deaths) Pluss all those who did not get treatment for life threatening cancer, stroke and heart attack risk. If we don’t think we get excess mortality from shutting hospitals  why do we have hospitals?




Kommentarer

Legg inn en kommentar

Populære innlegg fra denne bloggen

Covid general thoughts

The number that we normal people can use to guide us concerning risk is not the number of deaths pr positive test. We don’t know the percentage tested, we don’t know how reliable the tests are, and we don’t know how many have had Covid 19 and are immune.  But luckily, like you indicate with your graphs, we can know risk of death by nationality. China is a bit over 2 pr million. Right now, Italy has 6820 deaths in 60 million, 113 pr million.  Annual flu deaths in Italy are around 340 pr million. It the numbers doble for Covid 19, we will still be way below normal flu deaths. And most of the people dying from Covid 19 would be the ones most likely to die from the flu, so if we hadn’t started testing for Corona, we might not have noticed anything at all, especially in China, but even in Italy.  A lot of people die every day from all causes, 1700 pr day in Italy, so many die with Corona, not from Corona. Maybe all the Corona deaths would have died anyway. We really don’t know...
Les mer

How to make a pandemic

How to create a pandemic Imagine that you want to start a pandemic, what would you need? 1. Find some vague criteria for what constitutes the symptoms that you want people to look for. Anything subjective that a lot of people can identify with,is ideal. Let us take memory problems and/or confusion + a few common ones from the Covid list. Tiredness, aches and pains are common and subjective enough. (For covid 19  the symptoms are:  fever, dry cough,tiredness. Less common symptoms:aches and pains, sore throat, diarrhea, loss of taste or smell, a rash on skin, or discolouration of fingers or toes) It would be a good idea to take something that is very common in old people  so that we can use death from old age as proof of the lethality of the new virus. 2. Then we would need something biological to test. Any RNA sequence would do, as long as it is not present in the whole population. If it were, someone might claim herd immunity very quickly. Actually it could be a R...
Les mer

Only one in 1000 positive tests should be counted as positive.

Covid tests may be 1000 times too sensitive From an article in NYT: "The PCR test amplifies genetic matter from the virus in cycles; the fewer cycles required, the greater the amount of virus, or viral load, in the sample. The greater the viral load, the more likely the patient is to be contagious. This number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to doctors and coronavirus patients, although it could tell them how infectious the patients are. In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found. On Thursday, the United States recorded 45,604 new coronavirus cases, according to a database maintained by The Times. If the rates of contagiousness in Massachusetts and New York were to apply nationwide, then perhaps only 4,500 of ...
Les mer